22 February 2018

Family Planning or Family Banning?

Female Sterilization: A close look from rural community perspective

By Alma Grace Barla

The news of terrible tragedy of death of rural women who underwent sterilization in the Bilaspur district of Chhattisgarh has caused anger and frustration to many people on such barbaric nature of controlling population in the country. Infact, this news wasn’t a surprise to me, but it left me traumatized for a couple of days. Some questions kept haunting me like why women had to pay heavy price while their men too are equally responsible for the family planning? Why only the rural poor and tribal women are forced to undergo such sterilization? Is there more population growth in the rural areas than in the cities?

According to the media reports, so far 14 women have died; out of which two were from the Baiga tribe. Forceful sterilization of Baiga women is against the Constitutional Provision which shows deliberate action and utter negligence by the Government.  Baiga community which comes under Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG) has been adopted by the President of India for their protection, and are forbidden to do sterilization as their number is constantly decreasing.

In 2012, during my home visit to the interior village of Sundargarh district, situated on the border of northwestern Odisha, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand, women of my village had similar stories to share. In a medical camp among the 100 young mothers, some went through sterilization and some were inserted with Intrauterine Devices (IUDs) or Copper T – one of the tools of birth control and were sent off with some amount of cash as ‘incentive’. Few women fell sick due to excess bleeding and were taken to the Govt. hospital situated about 50-60km away from the camp. It was a Govt. sponsored programme which was carried out in a mud hut by only one male physician and a nurse from a Baba Ashram (community health centre affiliated to a Hindu outfit organization). There was no account of cases of successful operation or how many suffered or died.

Most of the women told that they did it in fear and constant pressure from the health workers (they even considered it Govt. order), some were advised by their family members for monetary benefits and some on their own will. At the end of the conversation, I could notice a wave of confusion and anxiety about post-health complications ruling over their faces.

A mother of two children, Nilmanti (25) narrated, after insertion of Copper-T, how she lost appetite, saw changes in menstrual bleeding, lost weight, often suffered with fever, abdominal pain and could not go for regular field work. In the case of Sunita, she developed uterine mussel around the device and had to be operated on critical condition. There are thousands of women like Nirmanti and Sunita who have suffered the terrible side-effects of sterilization and use of IUDs.
"we  have every right to decide when and how many children we want to have" pic: almabarla
The local community leaders were apprehensive about this drive that it could be government’s hidden agenda to de-schedule the area by reducing tribal population in the district. Sundargarh is a store house of natural resources which fully falls under 5th Scheduled Areas (having 50.7% ST population) guarantees tribal autonomy and tribal rights over land and resources through a Tribal Advisory Council in the State. So also the community leaders and civil society activists from neighbouring villages of Chhattisgarh opined as there had been declining population trends in the figures of Census 2011. Some of the villages were reported zero Schedule Tribe families even though they have been living over centuries.

While six naxalite-affected districts such as Koriya, Dakshin Bastar, Dantewada, Bijapur, Sukma, Jashpur and Kanker have shown a low decadal growth rate, sparking off a debate on the reasons behind the decline and even the authenticity of the Census exercise in these areas show gross violation of human rights including unethical removal of wombs to claim money under the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (The Hindu), over 70 people losing eyesight in different camps, the green-hunt drive, extra judicial killings, development induced displacement all amount to the mass exodus. From the available information there are no other reasons like an epidemic, scarcity of food or sources of livelihood and existence as push factors but such govt. policy and action could be one of the hidden agendas of the Govt. to reduce tribal and rural population.

Another example could be derived from the Wayanad district of Kerala, where tribals make up the majority of people attending sterilization camps contributing to the slow decline of adivasi community and making easier for the Govt. to acquire their lands for developmental projects. However, this scenario calls for an independent survey, research study and in-depth analysis.

Various media throw lights on how women 10 times more than men go through sterilization operations in extremely poor and unhygienic camps, even though female sterilization is more complicated than men. Recalling my mother’s testimony and drawing a piece of her wisdom, promotion of alternative methods like use of traditional anti-fertility herbs would give better solution to family planning programme in the rural villages. So also our women needed to be more educated on natural or moral family planning that can help married couples either to achieve or to avoid pregnancies.
Cover Story Published in Indian Currents, 17 - 23 November, 2014, pgs. 36-3736, 

It’s Time to Fulfill the Promise: End Violence Against Women

Realizing Rights of Rural Women under the International Convention CEDAW
By Alma Grace Barla

I was quite amazed to know that November 25 is observed as International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women; over time, I started reflecting on this call. The origin of this day goes back to 1960, when the three Mirabal sisters from the Dominican Republic were violently assassinated for their political activism. The sisters, known as the “Unforgettable Butterflies”, became a symbol of the crisis of violence against women throughout the world. To commemorate their lives and to promote global recognition of gender violence, in December 1999 the United Nations General Assembly called for November 25 to be observed with this significance.

Every day as I turn the pages of newspapers in any language or turn on the news channel, often I come across a story of terrorizing and dehumanizing violence on women and children taking place in some part of India! The terror of rape and violence against women on a land known for its rich culture and tradition has indeed brought India to limelight for the wrong reasons, to say the least.

Our Constitution guarantees fundamental freedom and equal protection of laws to all its citizens, recognizing the Right to Nondiscrimination and Equality for women by law. However, the enforcement laws have constantly failed to provide even the basic protection to women, especially the dalit, tribal and other marginalized women. We have seen major protests which had broken out across the country over brutal rape of a 23-year-old medical student in New Delhi, commonly referred to as the Nirbhaya Case, forced the government to look into these issues deep rooted misogyny and come out with the Criminal Law Amendment Act 2013.

News that come out each day of aggravated sexual assaults or brutal murder of girls and women or rape of minor school children reiterates that despite the Amendments which broadened the definition of sexual assault and recognized the gradation in seriousness in crimes of sexual assault, the resistance to the new laws and the continued subjugation of women through class, caste dominance is only getting stronger by the day. This is dangerous and can pose serious threat to the Rule of Law and peace in society.
The adivasi and rural community, who once lived peacefully in harmony with the nature, also have been largely affected by this terror in recent past. Though the status of tribal women in India has been acknowledged as being better than that of their non-tribal counterparts today they are facing various types of discrimination and violence due to their distinct identities, sex, gender, ethnicities, culture, traditions, practices and customary laws.

During the colonization and building of the new nation states, the particularities of indigenous/tribal identity and culture have often been negatively emphasized to facilitate a single “national identity.”(Realizing Indigenous Women’s Rights: A Handbook on the CEDAW, 2013). The Indian nation state united the pre-British Hindu dominated nations on the basis of their common aspirations and forced ‘others’, who were in minority, to be part of if it on the basis of the principle of ‘unity in diversity’ not the ‘union in diversities’. (RD Munda & S Bosu Mullick, 2003). Thus the aspect of unity always remained dominant over that of diversity and the indigenous/tribal people became part of these ‘others’. Further, the advent of capitalism, and exploration of mineral resources & establishment of industries, mines, dams, river valley projects have uprooted thousands of tribal villages and families; millions have been deprived of their subsistence with denudation of forest, land and water resources. In the conflict zones like in North East and Green Hunt Operation belt of Central India, tribal women have been additionally victimized through physical violence, rape and sexual harassment as tools of war or to suppress the people’s resistance.

Milestones have been achieved in the development of human rights instruments and standards designed to address these issues, at national and international levels including special instrument of treaty bodies for women and human rights bodies setting standards for indigenous tribal peoples. However, these have yet to be realized on the ground. The challenge for us is to translate these documents and instruments to name the International Convention of Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and examine it in the context of rights of adivasi/tribal and women. CEDAW, which contain no reference to indigenous/tribal women must be interpreted in conformity with the UN Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), to enable the lives of people affected by multiple forms of discrimination to have avenues available to them where multiple instruments and bodies can work together to address their concerns.

In spite of the existence of Prevention of Atrocity against SC-ST Act (POA), violence against dalit and adivasi women is rarely prosecuted under this law, or treated seriously. The criminal justice system has failed to bring justice to Indigenous/tribal women survivors. There is very weak access to the justice system of the country by women. Likewise, most adivasi/tribal women are not aware of their rights including to due process, and have little access to competent lawyers. Further many women in custody of the police or other authorities end up being raped or sexually abused (Case of Soni Sori, Chhattisgarh).
The Indian government must examine its relationship with the tribal customary system and how they are strengthening their self-governing system by recognizing legal pluralism. The tribal people’s positive customary laws consistent with the respect for human rights and upholding the dignity of indigenous peoples can provide an alternative and more sustainable model for achieving justice and peace.

There is large scale trafficking of adivasi girls and women for exploiting labour. Migration induced by non-inclusive development/large projects/extractive industries, loss of traditional livelihoods, lack of quality education, lack of sustainable income opportunities, have led thousands of tribal women to migrate to cities in search of jobs. Many have become victims of trafficking by false inducements and placement agencies. Thousands of the domestic workers are controlled by unregulated placement agencies that induce traffic and control their wages. In spite of the existence of various laws and developmental programmes, no visible improvement has taken place. Trafficking in Delhi and neighbouring states has increased manifold in last 10 years (Times of India, Sep. 10, 2014).

The government run Ujjwala programme report states that rehabilitation centres were set up, 10,000 police personnel were trained to handle trafficking. The report however doesn’t give any account of its impact & outcomes.

Impunity for witch hunting created by lack of awareness, law enforcement and weak governance in backward areas cause innocent women to be persecuted for personal and material jealousies. In rural villages, widows and single women in particular are branded as “witches” and are thus subjected to inhuman acts such as stoning and severe torture even death. While the practice of “witch hunting” is not part of the beliefs of adivasis, it was introduced as a form of providing “explanation” to unexpected illness or bad luck for members of the village. As most adivasi are animist and have low literacy, they have “adopted” this belief, which is now being used as an excuse by opportunists to take away the properties of old widows and single women in most cases. In spite of reports filed by women to police and other authorities on those involved, many of the cases remain unresolved.

On 17th May 2013, in Jharkhand a family of seven members was shot at home while having dinner. Father was killed on the spot while mother was hit on her thigh, dragged into the forest and killed. A 7-yearold Adivasi girl studying in Sewashram residential school in Keonjhar District of Odisha was refused by the teacher to keep in the hostel saying that she is a witch, as she turns into a cat by
the nights and sucks blood of others, and was sent back home.

While there is a law to prevent the practice of witch hunting, it is not properly implemented; likewise penalty for offenders is minimal and does not provide justice. According to reports during 1991-2002, there were 733 cases reported of witch killings. In the year 2011, 34 witch killings and 196 cases of witch blaming were reported in Jharkhand itself.

Militarization/State Violence:
The Central Indian states and North East India have been sites of intense violence from where killings, abductions, illegal detentions, torture and sexual assault by the security forces are commonly reported. The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958, India’s most draconian anti insurgency law, provides sweeping powers to armed forces personnel to search and destroy habitations and houses, to detain people on suspicion and to kill with impunity. Similar tactics are being used in Central India in the areas where the armed Maoist guerilla organizations operate. In the State of Chhattisgarh, for instance, the National Crime Records Bureau reported that 138 people lost their lives in fake encounters. Moreover, the ‘salwa judum’ militia Dantewada has driven more than 4 lacs people from their homes since 2005 and emptied 644 villages, most of those affected being tribals including women and children.

An adivasi school teacher Soni Sori, who was accused a Maoist supporter, was tortured and sexually assaulted multiple times in custody. Even though recently granted bail, she awaits trial and justice. Ankit Garg, the Superintendent of Police, who was responsible for the custodial violence on Sori was awarded a gallantry award from the President of the India by ignoring the heinous crime he has done to an Adivasi woman. In a way it was to encourage the police officer to continue this kind of act.

Mrs. Leishiwon Mashangva (36), mother of 8 children, along with two men from New Canaan village of Senapati District in Manipur were picked up by state forces on 19th August, 2011 while collecting pig’s feed. They were blindfolded, kicked with their boots and beaten by policemen till they lost consciousness. Mrs Leishi won suffered multiple injuries due to which she could not breastfeed her 5 months old baby. In this connection memoranda were submitted to the Hon’ble Home Minister and to the National Human Right Commission of India on September 5th 2011. But no actions were taken.

To conclude with, the Govt of India and its obligations in implementing the provisions of international treaty on women need to be reflected in all the relevant agencies and bodies at all levels especially those relating to rural women. Further, there is a need to establish effective monitoring mechanisms on how these agencies are functioning in addressing the gender equality and take necessary steps with regard to the implementation of the Concluding Observations/recommendations made during IV & V Periodic Report of India on 58th Session of CEDAW held in July, 2014 at the United Nations, Geneva.

[The article is the summary of the Shadow Report on status of adivasi/tribal women in India, prepared in response to the Country Report submitted to the 58th Session of the Committee on Elimination of All forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), where India was examined on 2nd July, 2014 at the UN, Geneva. For the first time the adivasi women leaders from across the country came together to make their concerns heard at international level.] 

First Published in Indian Currents, 01- 07 December 2014, pgs. 11-14

The Tale of a Non-Milk Culture

During our wedding plan, in a conversation with my close friends in Bangalore who were to attend our wedding in my native village in Odisha, lightheartedly I said to them, “sorry we can offer you only black tea and not milk tea. You have to adjust please.” My friends were quite surprised and curious. I said, “our people in village are not habituated to milk tea. Even if black tea is taken, it is served occasionally during family or village functions. Some families offer black tea whenever they receive any guests; but during the winter mornings most of the families take black tea to warm themselves. Though packaged milk is available in the nearby market (nearly 8/10km from my village)… milk has not yet been part of our community culture.”

My friend asked, “but in villages you rear cattle, right?” I said, “Yes. Right now we have just four, before we had many. When I was young my grandmother (mita ajji) had gifted me a goat (female), which in couple of years multiplied into 40. In addition we also had nearly 12-15 cattle and 4-6 buffaloes. We had engaged two men (dhangars) to look after them, but we never used them either for meat or milk. While all the domestic animals (cattle, goats, chicken, bigs) were looked after well, only bull and buffaloes were used for ploughing and other agricultural activities. We did not even sell them, but few goats were gifted or exchanged with close relatives for family functions. We believe milk is for the calves. Calf has the only right over his/her mamma’s/cow’s milk, similar to a human baby. We want the calf to grow healthier, stronger and multiply more. This is our (adivasi) philosophy, our way of life. Earlier, families who owned more cows, buffaloes and goats were considered rich, though traditionally and primarily they did not rear for selling or business purpose. Some people would sell them only if required money in emergency. Other purpose was to use their dung as fertilizer and yield more crops. They are indigenous, representing many generations.”

My friend said, “well, here (in city) cow (milk) is one of the big source of income.

I thought, so if our people/adivasis rear commercial cattle and consume milk regularly it could also be an additional source of income besides agriculture. However, this makes me reflect on my village experience. In 1980s and 90s very often govt. officers and other agencies came to villages to convince people to take Jersey cows on loan for dairy entrepreneur purpose. After constant push by the authorities some families wanted to try the so called “the miracle cow” and got them on subsidized loan. However, within few months they had complains that the Jersey cows required extra care than the indigenous family cows. They had to be provided more fodder, which required a family member to collect good grass, provide water every day. In between the Jersey cow also had to be bathed to maintain hygiene. If they were taken to the grazing land along with other local cow herds they would behave indecently, they wouldn’t stick on to the grassland and always run towards greenery paddy field, and do not mix with the herd. Whereas, the family cows are less troublesome and self-depended. Six months, on non-agricultural season, freely they go around the fields and forest, graze by themselves, drink water from streams, rivers, ponds etc., rest under the trees and before the sunset they return home by themselves. During agricultural season they needed to be guarded and be taken for grazing to the barren lands and forests by the villagers in groups so that the cattle do not damage the crop. Their dung released on grazing land and fields also work as free fertilizer for farmers. So also the cattle greatly contribute to biodiversity.
Thus, Jersey cow scheme became a flop campaign in my village area. People who were using (mostly non-tribals) preferred desi (indigenous) cow milk or ghee than the Jersey. People also did not eat Jersey beef. Of no use, finally those cows were returned back to the block office/agencies. It’s been nearly 20 years, I have not seen any Jersey cow in my village.

Most of our adivasis/tribals (from Chhotanagpur region) particularly living in villages are allergic to milk and milk products. (This is also found among the other tribes across India). Most of them find it smelly and cannot digest. While some people drink milk for few days to recover fast from any illness/physical weakness, ghee is used only for medicinal purpose often mixed with herbs to treat different diseases. Generally milk is not consumed by our people. In many cases when our people go to cites it takes some time for them to get used to milk products, and some can never adopt. It may sound silly for regular milk takers.

We often get to read, how in multi-crore cattle industry business, cruelty imposed on them from birth to death. Repeatedly impregnated by artificial insemination, genetic manipulation, antibiotics etc. affect their health. In farms, both the mother cows and the calves are separated for couple of days, so that the calves have limited suckling, which is violation of a vital process of maternal bond. How would it feel to a nursing (human) mom? One can argue, besides calf’s share of milk, extra or remaining milk is consumed by us/human. But, when, we can decide ourselves the quantity and quality of food we should consume, how can we restrict a calf’s thirst!

Against popular myth/belief of milk intake, my villagers live healthier than we city dwellers. They consume balanced nutritional food from their self-grown crops, wild-veggies available in forests and fields, fresh water fish, egg and meat. Livestock is occasionally used for meat (self-consumption and some time selling in market) and agricultural activities. Their agricultural practices, holistic relation with the nature and natural resources (shared property) teaches us to balance between need and greed, to respect nature, and not to exploit.

Tribal ways of life and their livelihoods can teach a lot about preserving natural resources, growing food in sustainable ways and living in harmony with the nature. While choice of food is a fundamental right, in this growing consumerist world, can tribal way of life be a possible alternative?

Cattle being fed special food on the occasion of Sohrai/Cattle Festival 
(pic: www.videovolunteers.org)
Pic: alma@simdega paikbahal